Self Evaluation Format

Name

Conference

Committee

Country

Topic(s)

Respond to all five of the following questions. You may write your responses in the form of a long or journal; the style may be informal. Each response should be approximately one to two paragraphs long. Attention must be paid to detail.

1. What was your first impression of your committee and did this perception change throughout the course of the conference? Why or why not?
2. Comment on the general nature of the committee: caucusing, speeches, comments, resolutions, and resolution writing, etc. Note anything unusual about the committee in which you have not witnessed at prior conferences.
3. Explain your process of researching for this conference and any research procedures that your have not used in the past. Comment on the effectiveness of your methods.
4. What seemed to be the characteristics of the delegates who took control during committee and/or were recognized with awards? If you received an award, describe anything that you did that may have differed from what you did at previous conferences.
5. What impressed you about your committee and the conference in general that we could use at our next LHHS MUN Conference? What were some deficiencies you saw in committee or at the conference that should be avoided at our next conference?

My co-delegate was: